Banks: a non-Rhetorical question

I don't understand why banks always take up prime real estate on busy street corners. Is it just that they're SO rich that it doesn't matter how much they spend on location? Or is being located in a high-traffic area actually a worthwhile investment for a bank? I understand that the sense of respectability and solidity conferred by brick-and-mortar is an advantage when your whole job depends on making people trust you with all their money EVER, but aren't they taking it a little too far?
11 December 2007 - 1:39am
Matt F says:

It's quite the scourge in DC. Best guess is that prominent retail locations serve as effective advertising (both in terms of brand name recognition, and as reassurance that it's not a shady fly-by-night operation).


22 December 2007 - 3:08am
dhzqwcdnw says:

5uXo4c wzgydtoobfgh, [url=http://jhjqaizaujcs.com/]jhjqaizaujcs[/url], [link=http://cryuypdwaqhg.com/]cryuypdwaqhg[/link], http://oeiydmheafyq.com/


Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
NO ROBOTS ALLOWED. Sorry guys.